The core values of diversity, equity, and inclusion are very important to me, as belief, and in practice, and in execution. But the Governor’s nomination of Judge Gabrielle Wolohojian fell short on those values.
It lacked diversity of opinion, coming as it did from a small, connected, likeminded group.
It lacked regional equity, again not representing any voices from outside of Boston. I have received many communications from across the state, but especially in my own district, I clearly hear disappointment at once again being excluded from having a voice in our highest court.
It lacked inclusion, giving the appearance that only insider candidates need apply, excluding qualified candidates that don’t have the right connections. This will significantly shrink the pool of qualified future candidates from even applying, and seriously damage the SJC’s reputation for integrity, which once lost, will be hard to rebuild.
And during the hearing earlier this month, I referred to the “elephant in the room”. The mere appearance of impropriety degrades the trust and confidence we have in our courts. Our highest court requires conforming to the highest standards.
The nominee herself also poses some concerns for me. I feel that she exists in a bubble of privilege, given her background, and she can only intellectualize the struggle of marginalized communities. I have to wonder if justice can be best served from that perspective.
Finally, the framing of this nominee as the single most qualified in the state, this placement on a pedestal, does not ring true for the many exceptionally qualified candidates outside Route 128. Did they apply? We don’t know, given the lack of transparency in the process.
I congratulate Justice Wolohojian for her appointment to the SJC, and I expect she will be a fine justice. But for all the concerns I have voiced at last week’s hearing and the reasons above, my vote to confirm was “No”.
